Software Production Management

Self-organization is a process of attraction and repulsion in which the internal organization of a system, normally an open system, increases in complexity without being guided or managed by an outside source. Wikipedia

Self-organized teams can be identified by some simple rules -I didn’t think about it until I heard Esther Derby @Project Shrink- that I would try to explain as maturity levels.

• Stage One: Managing and monitoring their own work performance. They assess the complexity of the tasks and the skills required to validate and assign the work in an effective manner. Then they also monitor the progress and performance.
• Stage Two: Cross training. Team is able to identify its weaknesses and bottleneck and plan a training to transfer knowledge and skills across the team members.
• Stage Three: Hiring and Firing. This one is, one of the most difficult levels to achieve due to the ability of the team to manage/control their own cost and budget. Most of the teams do not have even knowledge about the assigned budget, the project expected profitability or even to handle overhead. This is because small teams are most of the cases self-organized and probably do not have other knowledge than its production skills -production means skills required to do the job. At this level, the whole team is able to participate during a new team member hiring process or even to decide -on a performance basis- who should leave the team.

Self-organized doesn’t mean at all “unmanaged” team, it probably means that team is a mature enough to execute few of the manager tasks -but not all of them. Even inside self-organized teams is possible to find a leader or somebody that gives directions to the team -because the team is designated to do something that for sure somebody is requesting somewhere. So, yes, self-organized also have to follow directions (client or top-management). So there is room for Project Managers. However it is complicated to find the balance between what has to be done and what has to be delegated by the PM without negatively affecting the performance. Team is mature enough to be empowered but, I believe, if there is nothing to be managed then it is probably because it is not a self-organized team, it is because it is probably a spin-off.

It depends on the project manager culture and his/her personal strategy of management implementation -could be based on trust, or performance control, or micromanagement, because not all of the PM out there will have the aptitude to handle self-organized teams. And by the way, not all the skilled workers will fit in a team of this nature, some people is great following instructions, other people would be more productive if they are empowered to take some decisions.